Madhawi Devi Kanti Rajwar vs Late Kanti Chand Rajwar alias Kantichand Lalichand Rajwar — TP/1726/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020083722026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/8372/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/1726/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Madhawi Devi Kanti Rajwar

    Adv. Khushboo Pathak

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Late Kanti Chand Rajwar alias Kantichand Lalichand Rajwar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Status Summary: The testamentary petition (39 TP/1726/2026) was called for directions before the Bombay High Court. The court directed the office to issue notice to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff, Mumbai, and the advocate to file an Affidavit of Service and effect proper service as per Rules 399 and 400. The matter has been adjourned pending compliance with procedural requirements, including verification of any cross-petitions and furnishing of Administration Bond, with liberty to list for final grant after all formalities are completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/1726/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: The testamentary petition (39 TP/1726/2026) was called for directions before the Bombay High Court. The court directed the office to issue notice to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff, Mumbai, and the advocate to file an Affidavit of Service and effect proper service as per Rules 399 and 400. The matter has been adjourned pending compliance with procedural requirements, including verification of any cross-petitions and furnishing of Administration Bond, with liberty to list for final grant after all formalities are completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case