LOURDES VERONICA BAPTISTA THROUGH PA OF BASIL ROBERT BAPTISTA vs M/S CRESCENT BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS AND 9 ORS. Advocate - Kailash S Narwade — IA/1777/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020082742020

Filing Number

IA/1777/2020

Filing Date

29-Feb-2020

Registration No

IA/1777/2020

Registration Date

29-Feb-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LOURDES VERONICA BAPTISTA THROUGH PA OF BASIL ROBERT BAPTISTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S CRESCENT BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS AND 9 ORS. Advocate - Kailash S Narwade

  2. 2.HILAL AMIRA MERCHANT

  3. 3.M/S. SWIFT DEVELOPERS

  4. 4.EKLAK AHMED S. ANSARI

  5. 5.C.RAVINDRANATH NAIR,

  6. 6.BELLANCE LOUISA ALMEIDA

  7. 7.SANDRA CECELIA DMELLO

  8. 8.LEROY MARCELLUS MISQUITTA

  9. 9.CITY SURVEY DEPARTMENT

  10. 10.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  11. 11.AYUB M. SHAIKH

  12. 12.NASEEM AYUB SHAIKH

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/1777/2020 The document shows a procedural order in Suit 147 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court involving multiple consolidated matters between Lourdes Veronica Baptista (through her power of attorney Basil Robert Baptista) and M/s Crescent Builders and Developers along with other parties. The order dated 17th April 2026 simply adjourned the case to 17th June 2026 for directions, with no substantive ruling on merits provided in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  10. 30-Sep-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  11. 09-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  12. 10-Nov-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  13. 03-Oct-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  14. 03-Oct-2023

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  15. 01-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  16. 16-Jan-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  17. 21-Nov-2022

    At 2.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  18. 16-Nov-2022

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  19. 19-Oct-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  20. 10-Oct-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  21. 06-Oct-2022

    At 2.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  22. 19-Sep-2022

    At 2.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  23. 30-Aug-2022

    For Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  24. 29-Aug-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  25. 17-Aug-2022

    For Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  26. 05-Jul-2022

    For Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  27. 07-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 29-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1777/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/1777/2020 The document shows a procedural order in Suit 147 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court involving multiple consolidated matters between Lourdes Veronica Baptista (through her power of attorney Basil Robert Baptista) and M/s Crescent Builders and Developers along with other parties. The order dated 17th April 2026 simply adjourned the case to 17th June 2026 for directions, with no substantive ruling on merits provided in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case