SHAKUNTALA PADMANATHAN PILLAI AND ANR vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR MUMBAI — IA/1390/2026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020082302026

Filing Number

IA/8230/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

IA/1390/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAKUNTALA PADMANATHAN PILLAI AND ANR

    Adv. abhishek patil

  2. 2.VEERSHEKHAR GOVIND PANICKER, THROUGH HIS SISTER THE PETITIONER NO 1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR MUMBAI

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR. MUMBAI

  3. 3.ASSISTANT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, R-CENTRAL, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R-CENTRAL, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  5. 5.SAMBHAJI THORAT, THE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE

  6. 6.JAYA APARTMENT CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.

  7. 7.NAVKARMIK INFRA AND DEVELOPEMNT PRIVATE LTD.

  8. 8.ABHISHEK DUBEY, DIRECTOR

  9. 9.MANISH DUBEY

  10. 10.AKASH DUBEY

  11. 11.MANOHAR DESAI

  12. 12.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

  13. 13.SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER(PROP RESPONDENT)

  14. 14.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY (PROP RESPONDENT)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court, in Interim Application No. 1390 of 2026, granted a two-week extension of time to the applicants (Shakuntala Padmanathan Pillai and another) to carry out amendments in their writ petition against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and the State. The order was passed on 6th April 2026 by Justices M. S. Karnik and S. M. Modak. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1390/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court, in Interim Application No. 1390 of 2026, granted a two-week extension of time to the applicants (Shakuntala Padmanathan Pillai and another) to carry out amendments in their writ petition against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and the State. The order was passed on 6th April 2026 by Justices M. S. Karnik and S. M. Modak. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case