Harikishan Vedprakash Agarwal HARIKISHAN AGARWAL vs Additional Metropolitan Commissioner I — HCBM20082012026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 34. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020082012026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

ARBP/8201/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

CHALLENGE TO AWARD ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Harikishan Vedprakash Agarwal HARIKISHAN AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Additional Metropolitan Commissioner I

  2. 2.Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Department

  3. 3.Homi Jal Chibber

  4. 4.Persi Jal Chibber

  5. 5.Dias J Chibber

  6. 6.Zarin Burzor Joshi

  7. 7.Meherwan Burzor Joshi

  8. 8.Rayomand Burzor Joshi

  9. 9.Veera Framroze Joshi

  10. 10.Zubin Framroze Joshi

  11. 11.Percy Framroze Joshi

  12. 12.Zarir Rustum Joshii

  13. 13.Shirin R Antia

  14. 14.Bakhtawar Dara Joshi

  15. 15.Burjor Dara Joshi

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court issued an order on 19th June 2026 giving petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance within two weeks. Multiple arbitration petitions (ARBPL cases) were listed for rejection, with various advocates appearing for petitioners and respondents. Failure to comply with this directive will result in automatic rejection of the petitions under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court issued an order on 19th June 2026 giving petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance within two weeks. Multiple arbitration petitions (ARBPL cases) were listed for rejection, with various advocates appearing for petitioners and respondents. Failure to comply with this directive will result in automatic rejection of the petitions under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case