KIRAN BHAVANJI CHHEDA vs SAKERBEN BHAVANJI CHHEDA, — TP/1729/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020081992026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/8199/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/1729/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRAN BHAVANJI CHHEDA

    Adv. Charmi Shah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAKERBEN BHAVANJI CHHEDA,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Summary: The testamentary petition (TP/1729/2026) was called for direction before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar on 15th April, 2026. The court directed the office to issue a Citation and Notice to the Collector, and required the petitioner's advocate to file an Affidavit of Service and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office as per Bombay High Court Rules. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for final listing after all compliance requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/1729/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The testamentary petition (TP/1729/2026) was called for direction before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar on 15th April, 2026. The court directed the office to issue a Citation and Notice to the Collector, and required the petitioner's advocate to file an Affidavit of Service and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office as per Bombay High Court Rules. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for final listing after all compliance requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case