Kamal Kercy Bativala AVP PARTNERS vs Sheroo Pestonji Billimoria — TP/2528/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020081022026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

TP/8102/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2528/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamal Kercy Bativala AVP PARTNERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sheroo Pestonji Billimoria

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2528/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Bombay High Court (Testamentary Division) adjourned the petition filed by Kamal Kercy Bativala AVP Partners against Sheroo Pestonji Billimoria for directions. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond, and check for any cross-petitions. The matter was kept open for relisting after all compliance requirements are fulfilled and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2528/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2528/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Bombay High Court (Testamentary Division) adjourned the petition filed by Kamal Kercy Bativala AVP Partners against Sheroo Pestonji Billimoria for directions. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond, and check for any cross-petitions. The matter was kept open for relisting after all compliance requirements are fulfilled and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case