INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED DISHA KARAMBAR ASSOCIATES vs ASHOK KERUBA ADHAV AND ANR. — EXA/1393/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020081002015

Filing Number

EXA/672/2015

Filing Date

19-Mar-2015

Registration No

EXA/1393/2015

Registration Date

16-Jul-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED DISHA KARAMBAR ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK KERUBA ADHAV AND ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award and dismissed the execution application, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the limitation period from the original arbitration invocation, unless the parties have an express written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 19-Mar-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1393/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award and dismissed the execution application, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the limitation period from the original arbitration invocation, unless the parties have an express written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case