PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 42 MUMBAI vs RAJESH KUMAR C JAIN — HCBM20080402025
Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020080402025
e-Filing Number
11-03-2025
Filing Number
ITXA/8039/2025
Filing Date
11-Mar-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )
Sub-Category
PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 42 MUMBAI
Adv. Sushma Nagaraj
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJESH KUMAR C JAIN
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court ordered that appellants in multiple Income Tax Appeals (including the case involving PR Commissioner of Income Tax 42 Mumbai v. Rajesh Kumar C Jain) must remove office objections and register their appeals within two weeks by filing compliance documents, failing which the appeals will be rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. No appellants were present at the hearing on 8th June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
11-Mar-2025
Case filed
Summary: The Bombay High Court ordered that appellants in multiple Income Tax Appeals (including the case involving PR Commissioner of Income Tax 42 Mumbai v. Rajesh Kumar C Jain) must remove office objections and register their appeals within two weeks by filing compliance documents, failing which the appeals will be rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. No appellants were present at the hearing on 8th June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts