Samir Rameshchandra Ramesh Palod vs Nanda Rameshchandra Palod alias Nanda Ramesh Palod, — TP/1679/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020079522026

e-Filing Number

01-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/7951/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/1679/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Samir Rameshchandra Ramesh Palod

    Adv. Vitthal G Sankpal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nanda Rameshchandra Palod alias Nanda Ramesh Palod,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Summary: The testamentary petition (TP/1679/2026) was called for direction before the Bombay High Court on 9th April, 2026. The court directed the advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, effect proper service as per Rules 399-400, furnish an Administration Bond, and verify if any cross-petitions are filed. The matter is adjourned pending compliance, with liberty to relist after all procedural requirements are satisfied and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/1679/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The testamentary petition (TP/1679/2026) was called for direction before the Bombay High Court on 9th April, 2026. The court directed the advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, effect proper service as per Rules 399-400, furnish an Administration Bond, and verify if any cross-petitions are filed. The matter is adjourned pending compliance, with liberty to relist after all procedural requirements are satisfied and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case