Sanaa Farouque Shaikh vs Ayesha Farouque Shaikh nee Roopa Gunvantrai Mehta — TP/2538/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020079132026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/7912/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2538/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanaa Farouque Shaikh

    Adv. Pushpanjali Arora

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ayesha Farouque Shaikh nee Roopa Gunvantrai Mehta

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2538/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar adjourned the petition filed by Sanaa Farouque Shaikh against Ayesha Farouque Shaikh for directions. The court directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector, and the petitioner's advocate must file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs via the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions, with liberty to list the matter for final grant after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2538/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2538/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar adjourned the petition filed by Sanaa Farouque Shaikh against Ayesha Farouque Shaikh for directions. The court directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector, and the petitioner's advocate must file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs via the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions, with liberty to list the matter for final grant after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case