THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE, HIGH COURT,BOMBAY THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE, HIGH COURT,BOMBAY vs RAKESH KEDIA — OAR/27/2025

Case under Presidency Towns Insolvancy Act 1909 Section 14. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 12th December 2025.

CNR: HCBM020079042025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

OAR/7903/2025

Filing Date

11-03-2025

Registration No

OAR/27/2025

Registration Date

11-03-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

12th December 2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Presidency Towns Insolvancy Act 1909 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE, HIGH COURT,BOMBAY THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE, HIGH COURT,BOMBAY

Respondent(s)

RAKESH KEDIA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

18-03-2025

OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE REPORT FOR DIRECTION

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Case Summary: OAR/27/2025 The Bombay High Court noted that insolvent Rakesh Kedia partially complied with court directions by depositing Rs.50,000 for valuer fees but failed to deposit Rs.1,00,000 as a precondition to file reply. The court adjourned the matter to July 3, 2026, after noting the insolvent's pending appeal against the deposit requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OAR/27/2025 The Bombay High Court noted that insolvent Rakesh Kedia partially complied with court directions by depositing Rs.50,000 for valuer fees but failed to deposit Rs.1,00,000 as a precondition to file reply. The court adjourned the matter to July 3, 2026, after noting the insolvent's pending appeal against the deposit requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case