NEWLOOK CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ANR vs THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND 7 ORS. AND NIKHIL AUSTIN DSOUZA (APPLICANT/INTERVEN — IA/1391/2020

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Jul-2020

CNR: HCBM020078852020

Filing Number

IA/1391/2020

Filing Date

17-Feb-2020

Registration No

IA/1391/2020

Registration Date

17-Feb-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEWLOOK CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ANR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND 7 ORS. AND NIKHIL AUSTIN DSOUZA (APPLICANT/INTERVEN

    Adv. ANAND PANDE,APPLICANT/INTERVENOR 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 3586 of 2019 filed by Newlook Constructions Pvt Ltd for non-prosecution on June 9, 2026. The petitioners did not appear before the court and showed no interest in pursuing the petition, which had been pending since 2019. All pending interim applications were also disposed of, though the petitioners retained liberty to apply for restoration if they could demonstrate the cause still survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Jul-2020

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. Kathawalla

  4. 17-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1391/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 3586 of 2019 filed by Newlook Constructions Pvt Ltd for non-prosecution on June 9, 2026. The petitioners did not appear before the court and showed no interest in pursuing the petition, which had been pending since 2019. All pending interim applications were also disposed of, though the petitioners retained liberty to apply for restoration if they could demonstrate the cause still survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case