NEWLOOK CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ANR vs THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND 7 ORS. AND NIKHIL AUSTIN DSOUZA (APPLICANT/INTERVEN — IA/1391/2020

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 09th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020078852020

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

21st July 2020

Filing Number

IA/1391/2020

Filing Date

17-02-2020

Registration No

IA/1391/2020

Registration Date

17-02-2020

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act

Petitioner(s)

NEWLOOK CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ANR

Respondent(s)

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND 7 ORS. AND NIKHIL AUSTIN DSOUZA (APPLICANT/INTERVEN

Adv. ANAND PANDE,APPLICANT/INTERVENOR 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

21-07-2020

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

09-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 3586 of 2019 filed by Newlook Constructions Pvt Ltd for non-prosecution on June 9, 2026. The petitioners did not appear before the court and showed no interest in pursuing the petition, which had been pending since 2019. All pending interim applications were also disposed of, though the petitioners retained liberty to apply for restoration if they could demonstrate the cause still survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 3586 of 2019 filed by Newlook Constructions Pvt Ltd for non-prosecution on June 9, 2026. The petitioners did not appear before the court and showed no interest in pursuing the petition, which had been pending since 2019. All pending interim applications were also disposed of, though the petitioners retained liberty to apply for restoration if they could demonstrate the cause still survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case