M/S L AND T FINANCE LTD vs G.G.GRANITES AND ANR — CHS/428/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Sep-2018

CNR: HCBM020078272015

Filing Number

CHS/493/2015

Filing Date

17-Mar-2015

Registration No

CHS/428/2015

Registration Date

30-Mar-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S L AND T FINANCE LTD

    Adv. S. I. Joshi and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.G.G.GRANITES AND ANR

  2. 2.MS. G TAMILSELVI W/O MR. G. GOPALAKRISHNAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards in L&T Finance's execution application against G.G. Granites, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio. The court permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior arbitration period from any limitation period, while allowing relief only if both parties had expressly waived objections to the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Sep-2018

    Chamber Summons For Hearing And Final Disposal

    Provisional Board

  4. 17-Mar-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. CHS/428/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards in L&T Finance's execution application against G.G. Granites, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio. The court permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior arbitration period from any limitation period, while allowing relief only if both parties had expressly waived objections to the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case