VISAGE HOLDINGS AND FINANCE (P) LTD. vs ARUN GULAB PANDEY AND ANOTHER — EXA/200/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020078222022

Filing Number

EXA/7821/2022

Filing Date

14-Mar-2022

Registration No

EXA/200/2023

Registration Date

18-Feb-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISAGE HOLDINGS AND FINANCE (P) LTD.

    Adv. Mangesh Subhash Puri,PADMAKAR S GARAD,PADMAKAR S GARAD, PADMAKAR S GARAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARUN GULAB PANDEY AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.SHAILESH KUMAR JAISWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards, holding that unilateral appointment of sole arbitrators is void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent in *Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India*. Parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, though written agreements waiving ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 may provide exceptions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 14-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/200/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards, holding that unilateral appointment of sole arbitrators is void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent in *Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India*. Parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, though written agreements waiving ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 may provide exceptions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case