MOHAMMED ISMAIL MOHD. HUSSIAN SHAIKH vs COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND LAND MANAGER, MUMBAI CIRCLE — WP/2246/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 24th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020078202026
Filing Number
WP/7819/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
WP/2246/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Bench Type
Single
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
Slum areas ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMED ISMAIL MOHD. HUSSIAN SHAIKH
Adv. Fayzan Khan
Respondent(s)
COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND LAND MANAGER, MUMBAI CIRCLE
PRESIDENT / SECRETARY, SHASTRI CHS
SHIVALIK VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. Janhavi Rane
ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY, WESTERN SUBURBS
GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE, SECOND APPELLATE AUTHORITY MUMBAI CITY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 24-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of both writ petitions by consent order, requiring the Grievance Redressal Committee to decide two pending appeals by May 15, 2026, and MHADA to rule on the petitioners' eligibility representations by May 11, 2026. The petitioners undertook to vacate their occupied structures within 24 hours if appeals are dismissed, and were permitted interim possession pending these decisions, with the SRA authorized to forcibly retake possession if vacating obligations are not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of both writ petitions by consent order, requiring the Grievance Redressal Committee to decide two pending appeals by May 15, 2026, and MHADA to rule on the petitioners' eligibility representations by May 11, 2026. The petitioners undertook to vacate their occupied structures within 24 hours if appeals are dismissed, and were permitted interim possession pending these decisions, with the SRA authorized to forcibly retake possession if vacating obligations are not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts