BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED vs SANTOSH ANANT KOLTE — EXA/1559/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020077892025

Filing Number

EXA/7789/2025

Filing Date

10-Mar-2025

Registration No

EXA/1559/2025

Registration Date

16-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. BHARAT REDIJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH ANANT KOLTE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    View PDF

    Summary of EXA/1559/2025 (Bajaj Finance Limited v. Santosh Anant Kolte) The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in 250+ consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. All execution applications and connected proceedings were dismissed, with parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration with time already elapsed excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 10-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1559/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of EXA/1559/2025 (Bajaj Finance Limited v. Santosh Anant Kolte) The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in 250+ consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. All execution applications and connected proceedings were dismissed, with parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration with time already elapsed excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case