TATA CAPITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD) vs AVSAR ENTERPRISE — EXA/2591/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020077722025

Filing Number

EXA/7772/2025

Filing Date

10-Mar-2025

Registration No

EXA/2591/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TATA CAPITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD)

    Adv. O M Gujar Law Chambers

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AVSAR ENTERPRISE

  2. 2.NAYAN GALA

  3. 3.N. UDAYKUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in 189 consolidated cases (Serial Nos. 903-1091) involving Tata Capital Limited against Avsar Enterprise and others, finding the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio. Following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent, the court dismissed all execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 10-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2591/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in 189 consolidated cases (Serial Nos. 903-1091) involving Tata Capital Limited against Avsar Enterprise and others, finding the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio. Following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent, the court dismissed all execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case