L AND T FINANCE LTD. vs MAHIPAL SINGH RATHORE AND UMA KAVAR RATHORE — EXA/1030/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020077342015

Filing Number

EXA/599/2015

Filing Date

17-Mar-2015

Registration No

EXA/1030/2015

Registration Date

04-Jun-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHIPAL SINGH RATHORE AND UMA KAVAR RATHORE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in this batch of cases (serial nos. 912-1035) because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed related execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations, unless parties had expressly waived ineligibility objections in writing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 17-Mar-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1030/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in this batch of cases (serial nos. 912-1035) because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed related execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations, unless parties had expressly waived ineligibility objections in writing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case