Peter Francies Bothello vs Late John Peter Bothello Decesed — HCBM20076422025

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 278. Next hearing: 10th February 2026.

Next hearing 10-Feb-2026

CNR: HCBM020076422025

e-Filing Number

07-03-2025

Filing Number

TP/7642/2025

Filing Date

07-Mar-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION WITH WILL ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 278

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Peter Francies Bothello

    Adv. ALISHA PINTO

  2. 2.Richard Agnello Bothello

    Adv. PINTO ALISHA ALWYN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Late John Peter Bothello Decesed

Case History

  1. 10-Feb-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

    Summary: In Testamentary Petition (L) No. 7642 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioner has been granted a final extension until 30.03.2026 to remove office objections and get the petition registered/numbered. The petition will stand rejected for non-removal of office objections under O.S. Rule 986 if the requirements are not met by the deadline, with no further extensions permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)

  7. 07-Mar-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Testamentary Petition (L) No. 7642 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioner has been granted a final extension until 30.03.2026 to remove office objections and get the petition registered/numbered. The petition will stand rejected for non-removal of office objections under O.S. Rule 986 if the requirements are not met by the deadline, with no further extensions permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case