BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED vs SHIV PRASAD P MOURYA — EXA/2017/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020073972024

Filing Number

EXA/7393/2024

Filing Date

01-Mar-2024

Registration No

EXA/2017/2025

Registration Date

19-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. D V NAWADKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIV PRASAD P MOURYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (including the Bajaj Finance vs. Shiv Prasad P Mourya case) finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision. The Court dismissed all execution and interim applications, permitting the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded for computation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 01-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2017/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (including the Bajaj Finance vs. Shiv Prasad P Mourya case) finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision. The Court dismissed all execution and interim applications, permitting the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded for computation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case