SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED( PREVIOSULY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED) vs GURDITA SINGH TOURS AND TRAVELS — EXA/1245/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020073912024

Filing Number

EXA/7387/2024

Filing Date

01-Mar-2024

Registration No

EXA/1245/2024

Registration Date

05-Jun-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED( PREVIOSULY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)

    Adv. Sudhir Upadhyay

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURDITA SINGH TOURS AND TRAVELS

  2. 2.PRITAM SINGH JAWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the period of the previous arbitration from limitation calculations, unless there is an express written agreement waiving the ineligibility objection under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 01-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1245/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the period of the previous arbitration from limitation calculations, unless there is an express written agreement waiving the ineligibility objection under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case