UNITED PETRO FINANCE LIMITED ADV. NARAYAN AWATE vs GAJANAN INDUSTRIES LTD AND 2 ORS — EXA/94/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020073822019

Filing Number

EXA/593/2019

Filing Date

16-Mar-2019

Registration No

EXA/94/2023

Registration Date

21-Jan-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNITED PETRO FINANCE LIMITED ADV. NARAYAN AWATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GAJANAN INDUSTRIES LTD AND 2 ORS

  2. 2.NITIN RAMCHANDRA JADHAV

  3. 3.NISHA JADHAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the execution application and set aside the arbitral award, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision. The court permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations, unless there is a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

  4. 11-Nov-2022

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  5. 11-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/94/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the execution application and set aside the arbitral award, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision. The court permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations, unless there is a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case