AMBIT FINVEST PVT LTD RUCHIRA H SHETTY vs SUMARIA ENTERPRISE — EXA/659/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020073532023

Filing Number

EXA/7350/2023

Filing Date

15-Mar-2023

Registration No

EXA/659/2023

Registration Date

23-May-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMBIT FINVEST PVT LTD RUCHIRA H SHETTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUMARIA ENTERPRISE

  2. 2.KIRTI VIRCHAND SHAH

  3. 3.NITIN VIRCHAND SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    —View PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/659/2023 The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time spent in the void proceedings excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 15-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/659/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/659/2023 The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time spent in the void proceedings excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case