INDUSIND BANK LTD. vs SHIVAM FLEXIPACK INDUSTRIES — EXA/2809/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020072662024

Filing Number

EXA/7263/2024

Filing Date

29-Feb-2024

Registration No

EXA/2809/2024

Registration Date

22-Oct-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDUSIND BANK LTD.

    Adv. O M Gujar Law Chambers

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVAM FLEXIPACK INDUSTRIES

  2. 2.SINGH HEMALATA REATANAKI

  3. 3.RATANAKAR UDYA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications (covering serial numbers 902-1169) and set aside arbitral awards because the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under the Supreme Court's *Bhadra International* decision. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, provided there is no express written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 29-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2809/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications (covering serial numbers 902-1169) and set aside arbitral awards because the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under the Supreme Court's *Bhadra International* decision. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, provided there is no express written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case