TEMA INDIA LTD UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India — WP/2363/2026
Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section 74. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020072182025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2025
Filing Number
WP/7218/2025
Filing Date
04-03-2025
Registration No
WP/2363/2026
Registration Date
12-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TEMA INDIA LTD UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
Union of India
State of Maharashtra
Central Board of Indirect Taxes AND Customs
Additional Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise
COMMISIONER OF CGST AND central EXCISE MUMBAI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
DUE ADMISSION - 1
DUE ADMISSION - 1
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2025 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 24-06-2025 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Summary The writ petition filed by TEMA India Limited against the Union of India was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority. The court granted the petitioner six weeks from the order date (16th April 2026) to file an appeal, with an assurance that any appeal filed within this period would be decided on merits without objection to limitation, given the petitioner's bona fide prosecution of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The writ petition filed by TEMA India Limited against the Union of India was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority. The court granted the petitioner six weeks from the order date (16th April 2026) to file an appeal, with an assurance that any appeal filed within this period would be decided on merits without objection to limitation, given the petitioner's bona fide prosecution of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts