SHIV SHAKTI CHS LIMITED vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY RURAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT — WP/2081/2026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 23rd April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020071952026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/7194/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

WP/2081/2026

Registration Date

28-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SHIV SHAKTI CHS LIMITED

Adv. Yogesh Patil

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY RURAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTE

SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

M/S RAJLAXMI DEVELOPER

Adv. Madhur Surana

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

07-03-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

16-03-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

26-03-2026

HIGH ON BOARD -

23-04-2026

HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)

Orders

27-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

The Bombay High Court on 27th April 2026 modified its previous order dated 23rd April 2024 by adding a clause stating that parties agreed no further reasons need be provided for the order. The court's decision appears to be a procedural amendment reflecting mutual consent between Shiv Shakti CHS Ltd. and the State respondents regarding the grounds for the court's earlier ruling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court on 27th April 2026 modified its previous order dated 23rd April 2024 by adding a clause stating that parties agreed no further reasons need be provided for the order. The court's decision appears to be a procedural amendment reflecting mutual consent between Shiv Shakti CHS Ltd. and the State respondents regarding the grounds for the court's earlier ruling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case