SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED( FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED) vs MARIAPPAN MOOKAN THEVAR — EXA/1308/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020070812024
Filing Number
EXA/7079/2024
Filing Date
29-Feb-2024
Registration No
EXA/1308/2024
Registration Date
06-Jun-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED( FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)
Adv. adv amol shinde
Respondent(s)
-
1.MARIAPPAN MOOKAN THEVAR
-
2.SELVARAJ SUBHAIYA NADAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the time period of the invalid arbitration from the limitation period, but reserved the right to apply if parties had a written agreement waiving objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
29-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/1308/2024
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the time period of the invalid arbitration from the limitation period, but reserved the right to apply if parties had a written agreement waiving objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts