M/S. SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. SAIKUMAR PATHRUDU M vs RAMESH TUKARAM KHEDEKAR AND ANR. — IA/534/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: --DISMISSED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Jan-2020

CNR: HCBM020070272020

Filing Number

IA/534/2020

Filing Date

20-Jan-2020

Registration No

IA/534/2020

Registration Date

20-Jan-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. SAIKUMAR PATHRUDU M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH TUKARAM KHEDEKAR AND ANR.

  2. 2.PRAMOD TULSHIRAM SHIKHALKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple execution applications, including IA/534/2020 involving Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs. Ramesh Tukaram Khedekar, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of arbitration law. Following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision, the court dismissed all execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration while excluding the prior arbitration period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Jan-2020

    A

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master

  4. 20-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/534/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple execution applications, including IA/534/2020 involving Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs. Ramesh Tukaram Khedekar, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of arbitration law. Following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision, the court dismissed all execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration while excluding the prior arbitration period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case