SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. saikumar pathrudu m AND DEVENDRA V NAWADKAR vs AJAY NANA VAGARE — EXA/1640/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020069982021

Filing Number

EXA/6963/2021

Filing Date

10-Mar-2021

Registration No

EXA/1640/2023

Registration Date

17-Oct-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. saikumar pathrudu m AND DEVENDRA V NAWADKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAY NANA VAGARE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Relying on the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision, the court dismissed all execution and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time already spent excluded from the new limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 10-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1640/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Relying on the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision, the court dismissed all execution and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time already spent excluded from the new limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case