RAHUL HEMCHAND VISARIA vs NISH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - Sandeep Singh, ARCHIT CHATURVEDI — S/233/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020069372025
Filing Number
S/6937/2025
Filing Date
03-Mar-2025
Registration No
S/233/2025
Registration Date
25-Aug-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHUL HEMCHAND VISARIA
Adv. WHITE AND BRIEF ADVOCATES AND SOLICITORS
Respondent(s)
-
1.NISH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - Sandeep Singh, ARCHIT CHATURVEDI
-
2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
-
3.OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER D.O. (B AND F) F/SOUTH MCGM
-
4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BLDG. PROPOSAL DEPT. (CITY)-III MCGM
-
5.ONE AVIGHNA PARK CHSL
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
26-Mar-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
The case (S/233/2025) has been adjourned to 07.05.2026. The court directed the plaintiff to serve defendants with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service by the next date; failure to comply will result in dismissal under O.S. Rule 87. The office was instructed to issue a fresh Writ of Summons if necessary, and the plaintiff must follow Practice Note 60A directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jul-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
17-Jun-2025
Interim Application
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
04-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
04-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
03-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. S/233/2025
The case (S/233/2025) has been adjourned to 07.05.2026. The court directed the plaintiff to serve defendants with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service by the next date; failure to comply will result in dismissal under O.S. Rule 87. The office was instructed to issue a fresh Writ of Summons if necessary, and the plaintiff must follow Practice Note 60A directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts