SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. vs SAYED IMTIYAZ ALI AND ANR — EXA/187/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020068942022

Filing Number

EXA/6893/2022

Filing Date

05-Mar-2022

Registration No

EXA/187/2024

Registration Date

02-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. Devendra Vitthal Nawadkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAYED IMTIYAZ ALI AND ANR

  2. 2.SAYED SAHID ALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards in consolidated cases involving Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. and others, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of arbitration law. Following Supreme Court precedent that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all execution and related applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the limitation period tolled from the original arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 05-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/187/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards in consolidated cases involving Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. and others, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of arbitration law. Following Supreme Court precedent that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all execution and related applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the limitation period tolled from the original arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case