THE MEMON CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.(NOW BANK OF BARODA) K D SHUKLA AND CO vs OMEGA ELECTRONIC SCALE CO. LTD — CHOL/375/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020068912026
Filing Number
CHOL/6891/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
CHOL/375/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )
Sub-Category
Restoration which are rejected under Rule 986 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE MEMON CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.(NOW BANK OF BARODA) K D SHUKLA AND CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.OMEGA ELECTRONIC SCALE CO. LTD
-
2.DHANANJAY T. DHAKE
-
3.NANDINI D. DHAKE
-
4.SNEHA PRATAP DHAKA
-
5.SANDEEP J. NAKHWA
-
6.JAGDISH BALARAM
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Jun-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Case Summary: CHOL/375/2026 The Prothonotary & Senior Master heard the applicant's Chamber Order seeking to set aside a 02.04.2025 order that had rejected an application under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections. The court noted a considerable 246-day delay in filing the present Chamber Order. The matter was adjourned to the Hon'ble Court as per O.S.Rule 132 IX-A for appropriate directions, with office directed to take follow-up action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
For Hearing And Final Disposal
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
07-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CHOL/375/2026
Case Summary: CHOL/375/2026 The Prothonotary & Senior Master heard the applicant's Chamber Order seeking to set aside a 02.04.2025 order that had rejected an application under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections. The court noted a considerable 246-day delay in filing the present Chamber Order. The matter was adjourned to the Hon'ble Court as per O.S.Rule 132 IX-A for appropriate directions, with office directed to take follow-up action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts