KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD vs HINDUSTAN ENTERPRISES — EXA/1447/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020068302023

e-Filing Number

09-03-2023

Filing Number

EXA/6827/2023

Filing Date

09-Mar-2023

Registration No

EXA/1447/2025

Registration Date

02-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD

    Adv. S I JOSHI AND CO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HINDUSTAN ENTERPRISES

  2. 2.AZIM AHAMED KHAN

  3. 3.TAUHEED AHMAD KHAN

  4. 4.SHAKEEL KHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in consolidated matters involving Kotak Mahindra Bank and others, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court dismissed all connected execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior time period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 09-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1447/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in consolidated matters involving Kotak Mahindra Bank and others, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court dismissed all connected execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior time period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case