BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED vs SANTOSH PANDRIKAR — EXA/2205/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020067932025

Filing Number

EXA/6793/2025

Filing Date

01-Mar-2025

Registration No

EXA/2205/2025

Registration Date

04-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. BHARAT REDIJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH PANDRIKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    —View PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/2205/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (including those in the Bajaj Finance v. Santosh Pandrikar matter) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and connected interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 24-Jul-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 24-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2205/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/2205/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (including those in the Bajaj Finance v. Santosh Pandrikar matter) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and connected interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case