L AND T FINANCE LTD vs LAKSHMANAN AND ANR. — EXA/1596/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020067832015

Filing Number

EXA/517/2015

Filing Date

07-Mar-2015

Registration No

EXA/1596/2015

Registration Date

05-Aug-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LTD

    Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAKSHMANAN AND ANR.

  2. 2.GOVINDRAJ SINGHARUELU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in L And T Finance Ltd's execution application, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court dismissed the execution proceedings and allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration, excluding the prior period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 07-Mar-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1596/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in L And T Finance Ltd's execution application, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court dismissed the execution proceedings and allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration, excluding the prior period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case