ADIL JEHANGIR WADIA vs RESHAMSINGH PYARASINGH (SINCE DECEASED) AND 12 ORS 1. — IA/1166/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 17th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM020067442026
Filing Number
IA/6744/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
IA/1166/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ADIL JEHANGIR WADIA
Adv. LR Associates
Respondent(s)
RESHAMSINGH PYARASINGH (SINCE DECEASED) AND 12 ORS 1.
GURMIT KAUR RESHAM SINGH1.
SARABJIT SINGH RESHAM SINGH1.
GURVINDER SINGH RESHAM SINGH1.
GAGANDEEP SINGH RESHAM SINGH1.
JASLEEN KAUR SATINDERPAL SINGH1.
AMANPREET SINGH SATINDERPAL SINGH1.
HARKIRAT SINGH SATINDERPAL SINGH
BACHITTAR SINGH PYARA SINGH
RAJESHWARNATH MUNSHILAL GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)3.
SNEHA R GUPTA3.
RAJIV R GUPTA3.
RAHUL GUPTA3.
ROHINI R GUPTA
RAJKISHORE MUNSHILAL GUPTA(Legal Heir)
SATISHKUMAR MUNSHILAL GUPTA
BADRUDDIN BARKAT ALI KORJI PIRANI
ABDUL SATTAR S/O ABDUL BULAQUI FAROOQUI
AFSARI BANO PROPRIETOR - FAROOQUI TRANSPORT CO.
JEHANGIR ADI WADIA (SINCE DECEASED) (ORIG. PLANTIFF)
MUNCHERJI NUSSERWANJI MUNCHERJI CAMA (SINCE DECEASED ) (ORIG PLAINTIFF)
SHEROO JEHANGIR WADIA ( ORIG PLAINTIFF)
MIKA NISHIMURA (PROPOSED PLAINTIFF)
JEHANGIR M. CHOWNA (PROPOSED PLAINTFF)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
In this interim application before the Bombay High Court, the plaintiffs sought an extension of time to amend the plaint in the underlying suit, citing unavailability of new trustees. The court granted a four-week extension to carry out the amendment, with the defendant's consent, and disposed of the interim application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In this interim application before the Bombay High Court, the plaintiffs sought an extension of time to amend the plaint in the underlying suit, citing unavailability of new trustees. The court granted a four-week extension to carry out the amendment, with the defendant's consent, and disposed of the interim application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts