Dnyaneshwar Harishchandra More vs ASHA VITTHAL BHOSALE (DECEASED) — TP/2385/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020067152026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

TP/6715/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

TP/2385/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dnyaneshwar Harishchandra More

    Adv. Bhagyalaxmi Racha,JAISWAR ASHOKKUMAR,JAISWAR ASHOKKUMAR, ,SANDESH S SHETYE,JAISWAR ASHOKKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHA VITTHAL BHOSALE (DECEASED)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2385/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Dnyaneshwar Harishchandra More was called for directions on 6th May 2026. The Bombay High Court (Original Side) directed the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, and the advocate to effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court ordered verification of any cross petitions and granted liberty to relist the matter after all procedural compliance is completed and the case is ready for final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2385/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2385/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Dnyaneshwar Harishchandra More was called for directions on 6th May 2026. The Bombay High Court (Original Side) directed the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, and the advocate to effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court ordered verification of any cross petitions and granted liberty to relist the matter after all procedural compliance is completed and the case is ready for final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case