samidha samir mayekar vs anita madhukar kale — TP/1646/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020065892026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
TP/6589/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
TP/1646/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.samidha samir mayekar
Adv. SUYASH S KALBHOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.anita madhukar kale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
For Direction
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
The Bombay High Court allowed the testamentary petition filed by Samidha Samir Mayekar and granted her Letters of Administration over the properties and credits of deceased Anita Madhukar Kale. Since the petitioner was established as the sole legal heir, the court found no impediment to granting the administration, directing the department to issue the grant within 3 weeks, subject to compliance with any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/1646/2026
The Bombay High Court allowed the testamentary petition filed by Samidha Samir Mayekar and granted her Letters of Administration over the properties and credits of deceased Anita Madhukar Kale. Since the petitioner was established as the sole legal heir, the court found no impediment to granting the administration, directing the department to issue the grant within 3 weeks, subject to compliance with any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts