INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED DISHA KARAMBAR AND ASSOCIATE vs MRS. SARITA NARESH ROUT (BORROWER)AND 2 OTHERS — EXA/1595/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020065792013

Filing Number

EXA/286/2013

Filing Date

01-Apr-2013

Registration No

EXA/1595/2015

Registration Date

05-Aug-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Sub-Category

AWARDS ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED DISHA KARAMBAR AND ASSOCIATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MRS. SARITA NARESH ROUT (BORROWER)AND 2 OTHERS

  2. 2.MR. NARESH KUMAR ROUT (GUARANTOR)

  3. 3.MR. SADIQUE AKHTAR KHAN (GUARANTOR)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in Integro Finserv's execution application against the borrowers and guarantors, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court dismissed the execution proceedings and allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration, excluding the prior limitation period from the calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 01-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1595/2015

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in Integro Finserv's execution application against the borrowers and guarantors, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court dismissed the execution proceedings and allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration, excluding the prior limitation period from the calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case