PUNIT JAYANT PATEL vs JAYANT BALUBHAI PATEL — TP/2567/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020065282026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

TP/6528/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

TP/2567/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNIT JAYANT PATEL

    Adv. B G Saraf

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYANT BALUBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2567/2026 The case was called for directions on 9th June 2026 before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations and notices to the Collector, file an affidavit of service, and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The office was instructed to verify if any cross-petition was filed and place it before the court accordingly. The matter was adjourned with liberty to list for final hearing after all compliance requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2567/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2567/2026 The case was called for directions on 9th June 2026 before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations and notices to the Collector, file an affidavit of service, and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The office was instructed to verify if any cross-petition was filed and place it before the court accordingly. The matter was adjourned with liberty to list for final hearing after all compliance requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case