FEDBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED ASAP LEGAL vs Svastiga Distribution — EXA/760/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020064672025
e-Filing Number
27-02-2025
Filing Number
EXA/6467/2025
Filing Date
27-02-2025
Registration No
EXA/760/2025
Registration Date
29-03-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FEDBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED ASAP LEGAL
Respondent(s)
Svastiga Distribution
Dilip Ramjag Gupta
Mamta Dilip Gupta
Sushil Haridas Gupta
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay set aside arbitral awards in consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 901-920, 924) where the sole arbitrator's appointment was found to be unilateral, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed related execution and interim applications, permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, and allowed liberty to apply if express written agreements waiving arbitrator ineligibility exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay set aside arbitral awards in consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 901-920, 924) where the sole arbitrator's appointment was found to be unilateral, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed related execution and interim applications, permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, and allowed liberty to apply if express written agreements waiving arbitrator ineligibility exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts