SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD vs BALU NANA THORAT — EXA/1554/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020064512022

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

EXA/6450/2022

Filing Date

02-03-2022

Registration No

EXA/1554/2024

Registration Date

13-06-2024

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD

Adv. Devendra Vitthal Nawadkar

Respondent(s)

BALU NANA THORAT

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

15-04-2026

For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period of the previous arbitration excluded from the limitation period, unless a written agreement exists waiving the objection to the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period of the previous arbitration excluded from the limitation period, unless a written agreement exists waiving the objection to the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case