MOHAMMED HUSSAIN ALI HASAN SHAIKH AKSHAY VIJAY BHALERAO, KAINAT SHAIKH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THRU. THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF URBEN DEVELOPMENT) — HCBM20063752026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020063752026

Filing Number

WP/6374/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED HUSSAIN ALI HASAN SHAIKH AKSHAY VIJAY BHALERAO, KAINAT SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THRU. THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF URBEN DEVELOPMENT)

  2. 2.UNION OF INDIA(THROUGH THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY) MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

  3. 3.MAHARASHTRA RAI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CO(MRIDC)

  4. 4.MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAHATMA JYOTIBA PHULE MANDAI

  5. 5.JOINT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER (ROAD/PROJECT)BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  6. 6.THE WARD OFFICER OF E WARD

  7. 7.SURPREDEINT/DESIGNATED OFFICER(MARKET) BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  8. 8.THE CHIEF ENGINEER(ROAD AND PROJECT) MCGM WORLI ENGINEERING HUB

  9. 9.THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER(ROAD AND PROJECT) OF E WARD(MARKET DEPARTMENT)

  10. 10.ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER INFRA/ADMINISTRATION

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition (23 April 2026) and directed the petitioner to serve copies of the petition on the State of Maharashtra and BMC within one week, noting that proper service had not been completed. The case was listed for fresh hearing on 10 June 2026. The court also expressed concern about the petition's relevance to its jurisdiction, questioning how an alleged "acquisition" of a gala (commercial space) relates to the court's assignment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition (23 April 2026) and directed the petitioner to serve copies of the petition on the State of Maharashtra and BMC within one week, noting that proper service had not been completed. The case was listed for fresh hearing on 10 June 2026. The court also expressed concern about the petition's relevance to its jurisdiction, questioning how an alleged "acquisition" of a gala (commercial space) relates to the court's assignment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case