MOHAMMED HUSSAIN ALI HASAN SHAIKH AKSHAY VIJAY BHALERAO, KAINAT SHAIKH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THRU. THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF URBEN DEVELOPMENT) — HCBM20063752026
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020063752026
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/6374/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )
Sub-Category
Municipal Corporation ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMED HUSSAIN ALI HASAN SHAIKH AKSHAY VIJAY BHALERAO, KAINAT SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THRU. THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF URBEN DEVELOPMENT)
UNION OF INDIA(THROUGH THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY) MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
MAHARASHTRA RAI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CO(MRIDC)
MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAHATMA JYOTIBA PHULE MANDAI
JOINT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER (ROAD/PROJECT)BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
THE WARD OFFICER OF E WARD
SURPREDEINT/DESIGNATED OFFICER(MARKET) BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
THE CHIEF ENGINEER(ROAD AND PROJECT) MCGM WORLI ENGINEERING HUB
THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER(ROAD AND PROJECT) OF E WARD(MARKET DEPARTMENT)
ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER INFRA/ADMINISTRATION
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 23-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 18-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 10-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition (23 April 2026) and directed the petitioner to serve copies of the petition on the State of Maharashtra and BMC within one week, noting that proper service had not been completed. The case was listed for fresh hearing on 10 June 2026. The court also expressed concern about the petition's relevance to its jurisdiction, questioning how an alleged "acquisition" of a gala (commercial space) relates to the court's assignment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition (23 April 2026) and directed the petitioner to serve copies of the petition on the State of Maharashtra and BMC within one week, noting that proper service had not been completed. The case was listed for fresh hearing on 10 June 2026. The court also expressed concern about the petition's relevance to its jurisdiction, questioning how an alleged "acquisition" of a gala (commercial space) relates to the court's assignment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts