KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. M. B. KALE S. M. SURYAWANSHI AND ONKAR GUJAR vs SONI ABRAHAM ANTHONY and ORS. — EXA/322/2011

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020063122011

Filing Number

EXA/469/2011

Filing Date

17-Mar-2011

Registration No

EXA/322/2011

Registration Date

04-May-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. M. B. KALE S. M. SURYAWANSHI AND ONKAR GUJAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SONI ABRAHAM ANTHONY and ORS.

  2. 2.ABRAHAM SAIMON PHILIPOSE

  3. 3.SWATI PHILIPOSE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/322/2011 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The Court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded for the time already spent in the invalid arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 17-Mar-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/322/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/322/2011 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The Court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded for the time already spent in the invalid arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case