CITI FINANCIAL CONSUMER FINANCE INDIA LTD. M. B.KALE S. M. SURYAWANSHI AND OMKAR GUJAR vs MANOJ J. KOTHARI and ORS. — EXA/320/2011

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020063002011

Filing Number

EXA/463/2011

Filing Date

17-Mar-2011

Registration No

EXA/320/2011

Registration Date

04-May-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CITI FINANCIAL CONSUMER FINANCE INDIA LTD. M. B.KALE S. M. SURYAWANSHI AND OMKAR GUJAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ J. KOTHARI and ORS.

  2. 2.MANJU KOTHARI

  3. 3.MITESH KOTHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters after finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, rendering the appointments void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior arbitration period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 15-Jan-2014

    —View PDF

  5. 09-Dec-2013

    —View PDF

  6. 28-Nov-2013

    —View PDF

  7. 24-Sep-2013

    —View PDF

  8. 27-Aug-2013

    —View PDF

  9. 02-Aug-2013

    —View PDF

  10. 25-Jun-2013

    —View PDF

  11. 17-Mar-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/320/2011

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters after finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, rendering the appointments void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior arbitration period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case