CITIFINANCIAL CONSUMER FINANCE LTD. M. B. KALE, S. M. SURYAVANSHI, OMKAR GUJAR vs VIVEK BHAGWAN GAWDE and ANR. — EXA/268/2011

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020062272011

Filing Number

EXA/460/2011

Filing Date

16-Mar-2011

Registration No

EXA/268/2011

Registration Date

20-Apr-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CITIFINANCIAL CONSUMER FINANCE LTD. M. B. KALE, S. M. SURYAVANSHI, OMKAR GUJAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIVEK BHAGWAN GAWDE and ANR.

  2. 2.SANTOSH BHAGWAN GAWDE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in multiple consolidated cases (Serial Nos. 901-942, 944-1132, 1138, 1141, 1145) because the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, which the Supreme Court deemed void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time limitations excluded for the prior proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 16-Mar-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/268/2011

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in multiple consolidated cases (Serial Nos. 901-942, 944-1132, 1138, 1141, 1145) because the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, which the Supreme Court deemed void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time limitations excluded for the prior proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case