THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR BHANDARI LALIT V. JAIN vs THE BHANDARI CO-OP BANK LTD AND 5 ORS — IA/1300/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020061622026

Filing Number

IA/6162/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/1300/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR BHANDARI LALIT V. JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE BHANDARI CO-OP BANK LTD AND 5 ORS

  2. 2.BUILDARCH BUILDERS/DEVELOPER

  3. 3.BHANDARI MANDAL

  4. 4.KRISHNA SHANTARAM CHAMANKAR

  5. 5.ASHISH SHAMRAO PEDNEKAR

  6. 6.RAM SHANKAR BORKAR

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary: In Suit No. 2635 of 2008 before the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned to 1st July 2026. The court accepted the plaintiffs' reply in Interim Application No. 1300 of 2026 and ordered the defendants to file a rejoinder within three weeks. The plaintiff's counsel was granted additional time to obtain instructions regarding whether Defendant no.2 should be dropped from the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1300/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Suit No. 2635 of 2008 before the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned to 1st July 2026. The court accepted the plaintiffs' reply in Interim Application No. 1300 of 2026 and ordered the defendants to file a rejoinder within three weeks. The plaintiff's counsel was granted additional time to obtain instructions regarding whether Defendant no.2 should be dropped from the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case