PRAMOD LAXMAN PEDNEKAR vs DR RAMESH CHUNILAL HANSOTI — TP/3127/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act , 1956 Section 276. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020060262024

Next Hearing

30th April 2026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2024

Filing Number

TP/6023/2024

Filing Date

20-02-2024

Registration No

TP/3127/2025

Registration Date

30-06-2025

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act , 1956 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

PRAMOD LAXMAN PEDNEKAR

Adv. Muraleedharan KC

Respondent(s)

DR RAMESH CHUNILAL HANSOTI

Hearing History

Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

04-04-2025

FOR REJECTION UNDER RULE 986

07-04-2025

FOR REJECTION UNDER RULE 986

03-07-2025

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

30-04-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Summary: The probate petition filed by Pramod Laxman Pednekar for the Will of deceased Dr. Ramesh Chunilal Hansoti (died 24.02.2023) has been granted. The court found all legal formalities complied with, including affidavits from attesting witnesses and consent from the deceased's surviving family members. The office is directed to issue the Probate after correcting the prayer clause, uploading the corrected petition on the Bombay High Court portal, and verifying that no cross-petition or caveat has been filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The probate petition filed by Pramod Laxman Pednekar for the Will of deceased Dr. Ramesh Chunilal Hansoti (died 24.02.2023) has been granted. The court found all legal formalities complied with, including affidavits from attesting witnesses and consent from the deceased's surviving family members. The office is directed to issue the Probate after correcting the prayer clause, uploading the corrected petition on the Bombay High Court portal, and verifying that no cross-petition or caveat has been filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case