HDFC BANK LIMITED MEGHANA MILIND MURUDKAR, KISHOR CHALKE AND ASSOC. vs PROSENJIT DEY — EXA/422/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020060262023

Filing Number

EXA/6024/2023

Filing Date

02-Mar-2023

Registration No

EXA/422/2023

Registration Date

24-Mar-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDFC BANK LIMITED MEGHANA MILIND MURUDKAR, KISHOR CHALKE AND ASSOC.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PROSENJIT DEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (consolidated in case EXA/422/2023 and related matters) on the grounds that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 02-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/422/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (consolidated in case EXA/422/2023 and related matters) on the grounds that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case