YOKOGAWA INDIA LIMITED MV LAW PARTNERS vs SAJIV RAVINDRAN NATH — LPETN/134/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 129. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020059972026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

LPETN/5997/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

LPETN/134/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 129

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YOKOGAWA INDIA LIMITED MV LAW PARTNERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAJIV RAVINDRAN NATH

  2. 2.SAANVI HITECH PRIVATE LIMITED

  3. 3.CHAITALI MAHESH CHANDRA DUBEY

  4. 4.KIRAN KUMAR NAGARAJ GUNJUR

  5. 5.MAHESH CHANDRA VISHAWANATH DUBEY

  6. 6.DEEPALI DHARMENDRA DUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent Act, 1866, to Yokogawa India Limited, permitting the company to file and maintain a damages suit before the court despite part of the cause of action arising outside the court's jurisdiction. The court converted the interim application into a leave petition and approved it based on the urgency of the matter and the substantial portion of the cause of action arising within its jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPETN/134/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent Act, 1866, to Yokogawa India Limited, permitting the company to file and maintain a damages suit before the court despite part of the cause of action arising outside the court's jurisdiction. The court converted the interim application into a leave petition and approved it based on the urgency of the matter and the substantial portion of the cause of action arising within its jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case